ESG Consultant for インドネシア
Indonesia has rapidly emerged as one of the world's most strategic destinations for basic metals and downstream manufacturing investment — driven by abundant mineral reserves, industrial policy reforms, and aggressive downstream processing initiatives that have made this a central pillar of Indonesia's industrial transformation strategy.
Schedule a ConsultationOJK Reg. 51/2017
Mandatory sustainability reporting for listed companies & financial institutions
SPK Issued — July 2025
Indonesia adopts IFRS S1 & S2 via national sustainability standards
TKBI 3.0 — 2026
Expanded taxonomy covering agriculture, IPPU & waste sectors
Mandatory Assurance — 2026 Draft
Third-party ESG verification moving toward compulsory status
IFRS Full Integration — 2027–2028
OJK to amend POJK 51 aligning with international disclosure standards
Navigating Indonesia's ESG Regulatory Framework
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) compliance in Indonesia is no longer a voluntary exercise. Under OJK Regulation No. 51/POJK.03/2017, all publicly listed companies, issuers, and financial service institutions are legally required to prepare and submit an annual Sustainability Report — either as part of their annual report or as a standalone document — to the Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, or OJK).
As an ESG consultant specialising in Indonesia, we help foreign companies, domestic issuers, financial institutions, and State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) design, implement, and report on their ESG obligations in a way that meets both Indonesian regulatory requirements and the expectations of international investors and lenders.
The regulatory landscape is evolving quickly. Indonesia's Sustainability Standards Board (DSK IAI) issued the Sustainability Disclosure Standards (SPK) — aligned with IFRS S1 and S2 — in July 2025. OJK is simultaneously planning the release of TKBI Version 3.0 in 2026, expanding the Indonesian Sustainable Finance Taxonomy to cover agriculture, industrial processes and product use (IPPU), and the waste sector, adding approximately 537 new KBLI classification codes.
For companies without a structured ESG programme, this regulatory momentum translates into real compliance risk. Our ESG reporting services and advisory support are designed to help organisations build the foundation they need — before mandatory timelines close in.
OJK Reg. 51/2017
OJK CL No. 16/2021
Law No. 4 of 2023
SPK (IFRS S1 & S2)
TKBI 2.0 / 3.0
Law No. 40/2007
GR No. 47/2012
MSOE Reg. 2/2023
01
Strategic Resource Base
Mandatory under OJK Reg. 51/2017 and OJK CL 16/2021. Annual Sustainability Report required with disclosures on economic, social, and environmental performance.
02
Financial Institutions (LJK)
Banks, insurers, and securities firms must submit a Sustainable Finance Action Plan (RAKB) and Sustainability Report, aligned with OJK's phased enforcement calendar.
03
State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN)
Subject to MSOE Regulation No. 2/2023, requiring ESG disclosures integrated into annual reporting frameworks and evaluated against sustainable finance metrics.
04
Foreign Investors & PMA Companies
Foreign-invested companies (PMA) in regulated sectors — particularly natural resources and manufacturing — face growing disclosure obligations under the Job Creation Law and sector-specific regulations.
05
Private Companies in Natural Resources
Under Government Regulation No. 47/2012 and Law No. 40/2007, private non-listed companies in resource extraction must disclose corporate social and environmental responsibility activities.
The Regulatory Urgency of 2026 and Beyond
Indonesia's ESG regulatory environment is not static. Several simultaneous policy developments are converging in 2026–2028, creating a compressed window for companies to align their internal systems with forthcoming mandatory requirements.
The OJK has publicly stated its intention to update OJK Reg. 51/2017 to incorporate the new SPK standards based on IFRS S1 and S2, with mandatory adoption targeted for listed companies on the main board by 2027. Simultaneously, the Ministry of Industry plans to enact its Ministerial Regulation on Industrial Decarbonisation in 2026, with implementing regulations to follow, building on the Green Industry Standards (SIH) framework under Law No. 3 of 2014.
Non-compliance with existing sustainability reporting obligations under OJK Reg. 51/2017 already carries sanctionable consequences — including written warnings from the OJK. As enforcement posture strengthens and third-party assurance requirements move toward becoming mandatory, companies that delay ESG programme development face increasing exposure.
OJK Sanctions for Non-Compliance
Administrative sanctions, including formal written warnings, are enforceable under Article 13 of OJK Reg. 51/2017. As OJK strengthens market accountability mechanisms, enforcement is expected to become more active.
Mandatory Third-Party Assurance (Emerging)
2026 OJK draft regulations propose making independent verification of sustainability reports compulsory — a shift from the current "encouraged but not required" position. Companies without audit-ready ESG data will face timeline pressure.
TKBI 3.0 Expanding Classification Scope
OJK's release of TKBI Version 3.0 in 2026 adds ~537 new KBLI codes across agriculture, IPPU, and waste sectors. Companies in these industries must reassess their financing, reporting, and risk management processes.
Investor & Lender ESG Scrutiny
International capital markets increasingly screen Indonesian issuers against IFRS S1/S2 alignment. Poor sustainability disclosure quality directly affects borrowing costs, green bond eligibility, and institutional investor access.
Industrial Decarbonisation Regulation — 2026
The Ministry of Industry is set to issue a binding Decarbonisation Regulation in 2026. Manufacturing, consumer goods, and heavy industry companies will need to demonstrate emission reduction compliance under the Industrial Decarbonisation Roadmap.
Scope of ESG Consulting Services
Our ESG advisory and reporting services cover the full compliance lifecycle — from initial materiality assessment through annual reporting, third-party assurance preparation, and strategic alignment with Indonesia's evolving taxonomy.
Key Benefits of Structured ESG Advisory
Regulatory Compliance Security
Reduce exposure to OJK administrative sanctions, written warnings, and reputational damage from non-compliant or insufficient sustainability disclosures under current and forthcoming Indonesian regulations.
Improved Access to Capital
Strengthen eligibility for green bonds, sustainable loans, and development finance from institutions aligned with ASEAN Taxonomy and TKBI standards. Improve ESG scores that international investors use in portfolio screening.
Investor-Grade Disclosure Quality
Build a transparent, data-backed ESG reporting foundation that moves beyond regulatory minimums — positioning your company for global capital markets, strategic partnerships, and institutional investor confidence.
Regulatory Change Preparedness
Stay ahead of the 2026–2028 regulatory transition — from TKBI 3.0 expansion and industrial decarbonisation requirements to the eventual full integration of IFRS S1 and S2 within OJK's updated framework.
Stakeholder Trust & Market Reputation
Demonstrate genuine ESG commitment — not just compliance — to regulators, local communities, supply chain partners, and civil society organisations whose scrutiny of corporate ESG practices is intensifying in Indonesia.
Localised, Practical Guidance
Demonstrate genuine ESG commitment — not just compliance — to regulators, local communities, supply chain partners, and civil society organisations whose scrutiny of corporate ESG practices is intensifying in Indonesia.
Step-by-Step ESG Consulting Process
1
Initial Regulatory Assessment & Scoping
2
Stakeholder & Materiality Mapping
3
ESG Data Collection & Baseline Measurement
4
ESG Strategy & Governance Framework Development
5
Sustainability Report Drafting & Review
6
OJK Submission Support
7
Post-Submission Review & Continuous Improvement
What Companies Face Without Expert ESG Advisory
ESG compliance in Indonesia is operationally demanding. Organisations navigating it without dedicated support regularly encounter avoidable bottlenecks that delay submissions and compromise disclosure quality.
Dual Regulatory Interpretation
OJK Reg. 51/2017 adopts an inside-out perspective on sustainability impact, while the newly issued SPK (IFRS S1 and S2) introduces an outside-in financial materiality lens. Companies without specialist guidance often struggle to reconcile these two frameworks within a single, coherent Sustainability Report.
Inconsistent ESG Data Infrastructure
Many organisations lack standardised internal systems for collecting and verifying Scope 1, Scope 2 emissions data, and social performance metrics. Inconsistent data quality is the most common reason Indonesian companies produce Sustainability Reports that fall below OJK's minimum content expectations.
Evolving TKBI Taxonomy Classification
The expansion of TKBI from energy to agriculture, IPPU, and waste sectors in 2026 requires businesses to reassess whether their existing KBLI codes and financing arrangements are correctly classified under the updated taxonomy — a process that requires detailed cross-referencing with OJK's technical guidance.
Third-Party Assurance Readiness Gap
As Indonesia moves toward mandatory independent verification of sustainability disclosures, many organisations are not yet audit-ready. Building the data governance and process documentation required for credible third-party assurance typically takes 12–18 months of systematic preparation.
Sector-Specific Overlay Complexity
Beyond OJK's base requirements, companies in mining, forestry, energy, and manufacturing face additional ESG obligations from sector-specific regulators — including the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM), Ministry of Environment and Forestry (KLHK), and Ministry of Industry. Coordinating disclosures across these agencies adds substantial complexity.
International Standard Alignment Uncertainty
Foreign investors and international lenders often expect ESG disclosures aligned with TCFD, GRI, or SASB frameworks. Indonesia's regulatory baseline does not currently mandate these international standards, leaving companies uncertain about how far to go beyond OJK minimum requirements to satisfy global capital market expectations.
A Regulatory Partner, Not Just a Report Writer
There is a meaningful difference between a consultant who produces a Sustainability Report and one who builds the institutional capacity for long-term ESG compliance. Our approach is rooted in Indonesian regulatory practice — not imported frameworks applied generically.
Deep familiarity with OJK Regulation 51/2017, OJK CL 16/2021, and the implementation roadmap for SPK (IFRS S1 & S2) in Indonesia
Practical experience supporting listed companies, financial institutions, PMA companies, and SOEs across their first and subsequent Sustainability Report cycles
Active monitoring of TKBI taxonomy updates, Ministry of Industry decarbonisation regulations, and OJK supervisory trends
Cross-functional team combining regulatory expertise, ESG data management, and financial disclosure knowledge
Neutral, independent advisory stance — we do not manage your OJK submissions; we ensure you do so with confidence and accuracy
Ability to align Indonesian regulatory reporting with GRI, TCFD, and ISSB-based frameworks for dual-audience reporting
Established relationships with independent assurance providers, legal counsel, and sector regulators to support end-to-end compliance workflows
よくある質問
Is ESG reporting mandatory for all companies in Indonesia, or only listed companies?
What are the consequences of not submitting a Sustainability Report to OJK?
Under Article 13 of OJK Regulation No. 51/2017, non-compliance with sustainability reporting obligations can result in administrative sanctions from OJK, including formal written warnings. While Indonesia does not currently have a specific greenwashing law, companies that submit incomplete or materially inaccurate disclosures are exposed to reputational risk and potential civil liability grounds. As OJK strengthens its supervisory posture — particularly with the 2026 draft regulations moving toward mandatory third-party assurance — the enforcement landscape is tightening. It is advisable not to treat these as soft obligations.
How does the new SPK (Sustainability Disclosure Standards) differ from the existing OJK Reg. 51/2017 framework?
What is the TKBI taxonomy and why does it matter for our financing and ESG rating?
The Taksonomi untuk Keuangan Berkelanjutan Indonesia (TKBI) is Indonesia’s Sustainable Finance Taxonomy — a classification system that categorises economic activities into green, energy transition, or non-qualifying categories. It is used by financial institutions to assess the sustainability credentials of financing portfolios and by OJK as a key indicator of sustainable performance. TKBI Version 2.0 focused primarily on the energy sector. TKBI Version 3.0, planned for release in 2026, will expand coverage to agriculture, industrial processes and product use (IPPU), and waste — adding approximately 537 new KBLI classification codes. Companies whose activities fall within these expanded sectors will need to assess their taxonomy classification to maintain access to sustainable finance products, green bond markets, and preferential financing from development finance institutions.
How long does it typically take to prepare a compliant Sustainability Report in Indonesia?
For a first-time Sustainability Report, the process typically requires 4 to 6 months from initial scoping to final submission — assuming that ESG data collection processes need to be built from scratch. Key time-consuming stages include stakeholder and materiality mapping (4–6 weeks), data collection and verification (6–10 weeks), drafting and internal review (4–6 weeks), and OJK submission preparation. For companies that already have partial ESG data infrastructure in place, the timeline can be compressed to 3–4 months. Annual reporting cycles thereafter typically require 2–3 months once systems and governance are established.
Can a foreign-invested (PMA) company in Indonesia use its global ESG report to meet OJK requirements?
Global or group-level sustainability reports — typically prepared under GRI, TCFD, or ISSB frameworks — may form a useful starting point but generally do not meet OJK’s specific disclosure requirements as set out in OJK Regulation 51/2017 and OJK Circular Letter 16/2021. The OJK framework prescribes a detailed content structure covering the Indonesian entity’s economic, environmental, social, and governance performance, including explicit Board of Directors commentary, stakeholder engagement processes, and a response to prior-year feedback. A localised Sustainability Report for the Indonesian legal entity, referencing both global standards and local regulatory requirements, is typically necessary for foreign-invested companies that are listed or classified as financial institutions in Indonesia.
Does our company need third-party assurance for its Sustainability Report?
Under current OJK Regulation 51/2017, written verification from independent parties is listed as a content element but is qualified with the phrase “if any” — meaning it is encouraged but not strictly mandatory at present. However, this is expected to change. OJK’s 2026 draft regulations propose making third-party assurance compulsory for listed companies and financial institutions, as part of OJK’s stated agenda to combat greenwashing and ensure sustainability data is treated with the same rigour as financial data. Companies should begin preparing their ESG data governance and documentation processes now to be assurance-ready when this requirement becomes mandatory.
Ready to Build a Credible ESG Programme in Indonesia?
Indonesia's ESG regulatory environment is changing on multiple fronts simultaneously. The most strategic thing a company can do right now is understand exactly where it stands — and what steps are needed to stay ahead.
免責事項
このウェブサイトで提供されるコンテンツは、 PT. ビジネスハブアジア (“「“私たちは"、 または "私たち(以下「本サイト」といいます)は、一般的な情報提供のみを目的としています。掲載情報の正確性と最新性を確保するため、当社はあらゆる努力を払っておりますが、本サイトに掲載されているコンテンツ、製品、またはサービスの完全性、正確性、信頼性、適合性、または可用性について、明示的または黙示的を問わず、いかなる表明または保証も行いません。当該情報への依拠は、ユーザーご自身の責任において行っていただきますようお願いいたします。
私たちは 民間の独立団体 そして 提携関係にない, 承認者、 または 代理として行動する インドネシア共和国政府、その省庁、機関、または公式に任命された代表者。本ウェブサイトは ない 以下を含むがこれに限定されない、政府の公式文書またはサービスを提供、提供、または宣伝すること:
-
企業識別番号 (Nomor Induk Berusaha – NIB);
-
税金の還付または払い戻し。
-
滞在許可証または電子渡航認証。
-
パスポートまたはその他の入国関連書類。
かかるサービスへの言及は、一般的な情報提供のみを目的としており、公式サービスの提供または促進として解釈されるべきではありません。
当社は、お客様の個人情報を以下のとおり保護することに尽力しております。 2022年個人情報保護法第27号当ウェブサイトを通じて収集された個人情報は、[プライバシーステートメント]に明記されている目的のために処理されます。いかなる状況においても、個人データを販売または悪用することはありません。
本ウェブサイトにアクセスし、本ウェブサイトを利用することにより、お客様は本免責事項に定められた条件を承認し、同意するものとします。また、お客様は本ウェブサイトおよび提供される情報を、適用される法令を遵守し、責任を持って利用することに同意するものとします。
この免責事項に関する詳しい情報やご質問については、お問い合わせページに記載されているチャネルを通じて当社までご連絡ください。
免責事項
このウェブサイトで提供されるコンテンツは、 PT. ビジネスハブアジア (“「“私たちは"、 または "私たち(以下「本サイト」といいます)は、一般的な情報提供のみを目的としています。掲載情報の正確性と最新性を確保するため、当社はあらゆる努力を払っておりますが、本サイトに掲載されているコンテンツ、製品、またはサービスの完全性、正確性、信頼性、適合性、または可用性について、明示的または黙示的を問わず、いかなる表明または保証も行いません。当該情報への依拠は、ユーザーご自身の責任において行っていただきますようお願いいたします。
私たちは 民間の独立団体 そして 提携関係にない, 承認者、 または 代理として行動する インドネシア共和国政府、その省庁、機関、または公式に任命された代表者。本ウェブサイトは ない 以下を含むがこれに限定されない、政府の公式文書またはサービスを提供、提供、または宣伝すること:
-
企業識別番号 (Nomor Induk Berusaha – NIB);
-
税金の還付または払い戻し。
-
ビザまたは電子渡航認証(e-Visa、e-VoA)
-
パスポートまたはその他の入国関連書類。
かかるサービスへの言及は、一般的な情報提供のみを目的としており、公式サービスの提供または促進として解釈されるべきではありません。
当社は、お客様の個人情報を以下のとおり保護することに尽力しております。 2022年個人情報保護法第27号当ウェブサイトを通じて収集された個人情報は、[プライバシーステートメント]に明記されている目的のために処理されます。いかなる状況においても、個人データを販売または悪用することはありません。
本ウェブサイトにアクセスし、本ウェブサイトを利用することにより、お客様は本免責事項に定められた条件を承認し、同意するものとします。また、お客様は本ウェブサイトおよび提供される情報を、適用される法令を遵守し、責任を持って利用することに同意するものとします。
この免責事項に関する詳しい情報やご質問については、お問い合わせページに記載されているチャネルを通じて当社までご連絡ください。
専門家に会う

専門家に会う
Ing. Michal Wasserbauer、Ph.D.、CPA(オーストラリア)
ビジネスハブアジアのシニアアドバイザーミハルは、東南アジアで15年以上にわたり企業の立ち上げと拡大に携わってきた経験豊富な起業家であり、公認会計士(CPA Australia)です。Cekindo(InCorp Groupに買収)の創業者兼元CEOです。Business Hub Asiaのシニアアドバイザーとして、インドネシア、ベトナム、フィリピンにおける国際企業の市場参入、企業構造構築、規制関連アドバイザリーサービスを提供しています。.
完全な経歴を読む